Medical Robotics Magazine

The first and only commercial feature medical robotics news magazine, founded February 2007 by John J. Otrompke, JD, consultant and publisher


Medical Robotics Magazine is the world's first and only commercial feature news magazine devoted to all aspect of the medical robotics industry- including robotic surgery, physical therapy robots, hospital orderlies, and other topics related to robotic medicine. As a feature magazine, Medical Robotics features interviews, business news, conference coverage and editorials, as well as a generous portion of articles written by noteworthy robotics surgeons as well as clinical trials reports. MR has been on-line since 2007, and first appeared in print in January of 2008 at the annual meeting of MIRA (the Minimally Invasive Robotics Association) in Rome, Italy. Medical Robotics Magazine is copyrighted, features a nascent Board of Editorial Advisors, and is indexed by the U.S. Library of Congress. All contents (c) 2011 John J. Otrompke, JD Contact: John J. Otrompke, JD 646-730-0179

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

MR Editorial Advisor Tang Attends Conference with Taiwanese President

by John Otrompke

MR’s editorial advisor, Prof. Hsiao-Wei Tang, PhD, was honored to appear and speak at a conference along with the president of Taiwan, Ma Ying-Jeou. 

The Invest in Taiwan forum is an event focusing on minimally-invasive surgery technology, said Tang, who is also the director of the International Center of Excellence in Medical Robot at the Asian Institute of Telesurgery, , in Taiwan.
Tang is hopeful for progress with his developmental robotic device, the Hua Tuo robot, which will be publicly demonstrated on phantoms in Taipei, Taiwan, this month. 

The prior incarnation of the robot, the Vesalius, was developed with funding from the University of Leuven, Belgium, which stopped development last year. Taiwanese surgeon Dr. Min-Ho Huang, who has funded hospitals and research centers, convinced Tang to move the project to Taipei, and now he and colleagues have developed a second iteration, the Hua Tuo Robot.
“The IP belongs to the University of Leuven. Now they are preparing to sign the the memorandum of understanding with me. Although they own the IP, I have all the know-how in my brain,” Tang explained.
The new version, which was developed at a cost of about $50,000 US, is more compact, and its position is more adjustable, according to Tang. The prior version weighed about eleven kilograms. Tang also said be hopes one advantage of a Taiwanese-made device would be its affordability- less than $12,000, Tang speculated.
Following the demonstration of the device as a camera holder in the robotic surgery context, at Chiang Kai Shek Memorial Hall on November 20, Tang will depart for     another research engagement at Stanford University, he said.

Monday, October 10, 2011

Joint Working Group of Standards Organizations Meets to Define Medical Robotics

by John Otrompke

A joint working group of two standards-setting organizations, the International Standardization Organization (ISO), and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), met in Nuremberg, Germany for the second time last month to establish definitions for medical robots, as another step in creating standards for the design and manufacture of the devices.

While medical robots are thought as a preliminary matter to include aids for the disabled, as well as those which perform invasive and non-invasive procedures such as surgery, rehabilitation therapy, imaging and other robots for medical diagnosis and treatment, a number of theoretical issues remain undetermined, according to Gurvinder S. Virk, PhD, who chairs the entity, which is known as joint working group nine.

Distinctions in terminology could be important, according to Virk, who is also a professor of robotics at the University of Gävle in Sweden. “Up to now, robots have been classified as machines, and are therefore governed by machinery directive, established by the European Union.” 

Among other categories include personal care robots, which an an individual uses to help himself or herself without any kind of medical connotations, Virk added. “Some devices, such as assistant exoskeletons such as a device called E-Legs which is available in the U.S., or the HAL (hybrid assistive limb), by the Japanese company Cyberdyne, help old people move about, but the medical people on our committee say that getting old is not a medical issue.”

Virk is also the founder of CLAWAR, the association of Climbing and Walking Robots, which is incorporated in the UK.

“What’s the difference between medical equipment and a medical robot?” Virk asked. “It seems to me to be autonomy, whereas most medical equipment in current use does not have any autonomous functions.”

The distinctions can become thorny, according to Virk. “The da Vinci is able to filter out the tremor of the surgeon, and most people would argue that that’s an autonomous capability.” However, the FDA license for the da Vinci describes the device as an endoscope, not a robot, according to Virk.

The joint working group will next meet in February of 2012, in Orlando. Virk and colleagues are also planning an annual International Colloquium on Medical Robots, to be held next July in Milan, Italy.

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Multiple Training Systems Under Study at the University of Nebraska

by John Otrompke

Follow-up research is underway to validate a surgical training module used in-house at the University of Nebraska. The training method has already demonstrated improvements in speed and smoothness of movement, according to a paper recently published in the International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer-Assisted Surgery.

Following the most recent publication, researchers are validating the results with a larger trial.  “Right now we’re in the middle of about 25 subjects, and hopefully we’ll get about 50 students students and fellows,” said Dr. Joseph Ka-Chun Siu, PhD, assistant professor in the College of Public Health. The current study will look at retention of skills six months following training, he said.

The training program, which is in its fifth year, has trained about 30 individuals in da Vinci surgery, using an interface provided by Intuitive and a custom LabView program manufactured by National Instruments out of Concord, Massachusetts.

The training program uses a technique called Augman video feedback, in which participants can either watch their performance in real time or obtain quantitative measures of fast they perform surgical procedures such as suturing, Siu said. The institution purchased the commercial LabView software about ten years ago for about $1,000, according to Siu, and subsequently customized the software, because “the robot has no direct communication back to the surgeon, saying how well you do in this procedure,” Siu explained.

        Improvement in Some Measures, While Others Remain Enigmatic

   In the training program, 15 medical students with no prior robotic surgery experience went through a four-day training program followed by a retention test a day later, according to the article (“,Training program for fundamental surgical skill in robotic laparoscopic surgery,” Suh, Mukherjee, Oleynikov and Siu). 

Prior to the retention test, the average score measured by the Objective standardized assessment of technical skills (OSATS) criteria was 43.1%, but it increased to 66.4% after the training, and 74.1% at the time the retention test was administered, the paper said. 

The students averaged 25 years; 12 were male,  and three female. Researchers also examined the activities of the flexor carpi radialis and extensor digitorum, two muscles in the forearm that have been associated with surgical fatigue, and found that fatigue was reduced following the training program.

“We’re not going to strengthen the muscles, but rather to see how much muscle effort they use in order to complete the task,” explained Siu, who noted that the paper reported about a 30% reduction in fatigue following the training program.

Researchers found the simulator improved a measure called ‘movement curvature,’ a measure of “whether you move the robot in a smooth fashion,” according to Siu.

All students were right-handed. There were no significant differences in terms of the total distance traveled in performing the surgical procedures studied, the paper said. A prior randomized study of ten volunteers (“A Virtual Reality Training Program for Improvement of Robotic Surgical Skills,” Mukherjee, Siu, et al, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2009), found that improvements in total distance traveled enjoyed by students who used a virtual reality simulator disappeared when students used their non-dominant arm. However, that study involved a virtual reality program, not the LabView module, according to Siu.

                         Bountiful Training Modules

Another early study from 2008 (“Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment,” Katsavelis, Siu, et al, Surgical Endoscopy, 2008), noted the desirability of increasing the complexity of the virtual reality training environment.

“To increase the complexity of the tasks, we are increasing the steps for the participant to complete. That first report involved very simple tasks like bimanual carrying and needle passing, but right now we use the mesh alignment task, a procedure that people commonly use to repair a hernia, which requires multiple steps in order to complete,” Siu explained.

Another change from the earlier papers is that the virtual reality training program now uses a program called Vizart, manufactured by Worldviz, instead of the Webots program used initially.

“Worldlviz gives us more degrees of freedom, because the virtual object is written in a simple language, so that we can write it by ourself. Provide syntax so we can modify it with drop-down menus,” Siu said.

Regarding the module used in the training program, which incorporates the Labview product, but not the virtual reality simulator, Siu said the institution has not yet sold the product to anybody, although the studies have shown that 80 to 90% of participants improve their surgical skills. “We just use that one as our in-house training program. We did not have a good communication with the company” regarding commercialization, because Intuitive still has ownership of the platform, he explained.

Accordingly, the institution is also developing its own training simulator, which does not use the LabView product, he said.

Follow MedicalRobotic on Twitter